毕业论文摘要

发布时间：2026年03月15日作者:aiycxz.cn

论文题目：论我国民事诉讼中的证据交换制度专业：法律硕士研究方向：民事诉讼法作者：李颖指导教师：陈刚教授证据交换制度是审前准备程序的核心内容，也是我国民事审判方式改革的一项重要举措。本文以我国民事诉讼中的证据交换制度为研究对象，从证据交换制度的概念、特征、价值、功能入手，对两大法系证据交换制度进行了比较研究，在此基础上，对我国证据交换制度的现状进行了分析，并提出了完善我国证据交换制度的构想。本文共分四章，主要内容如下：第一章，证据交换制度概述。本章主要阐述了证据交换制度的概念、特征、价值、功能。证据交换制度是指民事诉讼的当事人在法院受理案件后，开庭审理前，在法院的组织下，互相交换各自持有的证据，明确诉讼争点，为开庭审理作准备的诉讼制度。证据交换制度具有以下特征：证据交换的主体是当事人；证据交换的时间是法院受理案件后，开庭审理前；证据交换的内容是当事人各自持有的证据；证据交换的目的是明确诉讼争点，为开庭审理作准备。证据交换制度的价值包括程序公正价值、程序效益价值、程序安定价值。证据交换制度具有以下功能：整理和固定争点；整理和固定证据；促进和解。第二章，两大法系证据交换制度比较研究。本章主要对英美法系的证据开示制度和大陆法系的审前准备程序进行了比较研究。英美法系的证据开示制度是指民事诉讼的当事人或诉讼外第三人，在法院开庭审理之前，通过询问书、要求提供文书和物证、要求自认、笔录证言等方法，直接或通过法院获取有关案件的信息，从而为开庭审理作准备的诉讼程序。大陆法系的审前准备程序是指法院受理案件后，开庭审理前，当事人交换证据，明确争点，为开庭审理作准备的诉讼程序。两大法系的证据交换制度在历史背景、立法模式、证据交换的范围、证据交换的保障措施等方面存在差异，但都体现了当事人主义诉讼模式，都强调当事人的主导作用，都强调法官的职权作用，都强调证据交换的保障措施。第三章，我国证据交换制度的现状分析。本章主要阐述了我国证据交换制度的历史沿革、立法现状、司法现状，分析了我国证据交换制度存在的问题。我国证据交换制度存在的问题主要包括：证据交换制度的适用范围不明确；证据交换制度的启动方式不完善；证据交换制度的时间不明确；证据交换制度的次数不明确；证据交换制度的内容不明确；证据交换制度的保障措施不完善。第四章，完善我国证据交换制度的构想。本章主要针对我国证据交换制度存在的问题，提出了完善我国证据交换制度的构想。完善我国证据交换制度的构想主要包括：明确证据交换制度的适用范围；完善证据交换制度的启动方式；明确证据交换制度的时间；明确证据交换制度的次数；明确证据交换制度的内容；完善证据交换制度的保障措施。关键词：证据交换证据开示审前准备程序当事人主义# AbstractEvidence exchange system is the core content of pretrial preparation procedure, and also an important measure of civil trial mode reform in China. This paper takes evidence exchange system in civil procedure in China as the research object, starting from the concept, characteristics, value and function of evidence exchange system, makes a comparative study of evidence exchange system in two legal systems, on this basis, analyzes the current situation of evidence exchange system in China, and puts forward the idea of perfecting evidence exchange system in China.This paper is divided into four chapters, the main contents are as follows:The first chapter, overview of evidence exchange system. This chapter mainly expounds the concept, characteristics, value and function of evidence exchange system. Evidence exchange system refers to the litigation system that the parties of civil litigation, after the court accepts the case and before the trial, under the organization of the court, exchange their respective evidence, clarify the litigation issues, and prepare for the trial. Evidence exchange system has the following characteristics: the subject of evidence exchange is the parties; the time of evidence exchange is after the court accepts the case and before the trial; the content of evidence exchange is the evidence held by the parties; the purpose of evidence exchange is to clarify the litigation issues and prepare for the trial. The value of evidence exchange system includes procedural justice value, procedural benefit value and procedural stability value. Evidence exchange system has the following functions: sorting and fixing issues; sorting and fixing evidence; promoting settlement.The second chapter, comparative study of evidence exchange system in two legal systems. This chapter mainly makes a comparative study of evidence discovery system in common law system and pretrial preparation procedure in civil law system. Evidence discovery system in common law system refers to the litigation procedure that the parties of civil litigation or the third party outside the litigation, before the court trial, through interrogatories, requests for production of documents and things, requests for admission, depositions and other methods, directly or through

毕业论文摘要

相关文章